On 04 Apr 2008, at 16:11, Travis E. Oliphant wrote: > <snip> > There are only two reasons that I can think of right now to keep > them in > NumPy instead of moving them to SciPy. > > 1) These are "basic" functions and a scipy toolkit would contain > much more.
Isn't this something you want to avoid? Functionality in two different packages: a small kit of functions in NumPy, and (eventually) another large toolkit in scipy. One package only, would be more convenient I think. I agree with Gaël that it's not really consistent with the NumPy/SciPy philosophy either. :-). So, I would prefer to see this nice functionality in SciPy rather than in NumPy. Joris Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
