> My impression has always been that to ensure > a patch gets appropriate consideration it > should be attached to a ticket... Point taken.
> I don't think this patch should be committed without more discussion. > This changes behavior and it is intentional that tolist behaves as it > does now. I somewhat understand the argument about scalar tolist returning just the number (as it's 0-d), but it really does seem that a function called 'tolist' should do what it says on the packet (and the function doc) or be removed for scalars. James On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Travis E. Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > James Philbin wrote: > > OK, here's a patch for: > > #718: Bug with numpy.float32.tolist > > > > Can someone commit it (I hope someone has committed the other patches > > i've sent)? > > > > I don't think this patch should be committed without more discussion. > This changes behavior and it is intentional that tolist behaves as it > does now. > > -Travis O. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Numpy-discussion mailing list > Numpy-discussion@scipy.org > http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
