On 10 Apr 2008, at 05:21, Travis E. Oliphant wrote: > Right now it looks like there is a mix of attitudes, about the > financial > functions. They are a small enough addition, that I don't think it > matters terribly much what we do with them. So, it seems to me that > keeping them in numpy.lib and following the rule for that namespace > for > 1.0.5 will be viewed as anywhere from tolerable to a good idea > depending > on your point of view.
Just to be sure, you are talking about functions to compute interest rates, cumulative interests, asset depreciation, annuity periodic payments, security yields, and stuff like this? Joris Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
