On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Konrad Hinsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2008, at 11:41, Gael Varoquaux wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 01:38:45AM -0500, Robert Kern wrote: > >>> Given that the next release will be 1.1, I think it is > >>> reasonable to > >>> include a few additional API breaks. > > > >> -lots. I don't want to break API compatibility again no matter what > >> version number we bump to, 1.1, 2.0, or 24. It is simply not okay to > >> do this again and again. > > > > +1 with Robert. > > +1 with Robert as well. My code still uses the oldnumeric API, so I > am not directly concerned by changes to the new one, but I'd like to > be able to move to the new API one day but most definitely only ONCE. > Konrad, if I recall you had some concerns about the behavior of numpy scalars. Do you want to make some suggestions while we are considering how to finalize the API and behavior? Chuck
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
