On 17/04/2008, Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 17/04/2008, Alan G Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It is not a breakdown. > > It is the proposal: > > restore the proper behavior of x[0], > > but keep submatrix extraction **exactly** > > the same as it is now (for nonscalar indexes). > > > > What it gains is that x[i][j] == x[i,j]. > > > As the patch I sent earlier shows, we can gain that without > compromising on x[0] == x[0,:]. > > The Vector class can be tweaked further in how it is converted to an > array. It would be easy to produce a 1d-array -- and there's some > argument for consistency there. > > I don't want you to feel that I steam-rollered your proposal, though, > so before I commit I'd like for someone to objectively take a look at > both approaches/patches and comment.
Split infinitive -- I'd get in trouble for that. Please use the latest patch (attached), which fixes a bug with assignment. I experimented with returning an (N,) array when converting using vector.A, but I'm not convinced that that is consistent behaviour, so I let that issue remain for now. Cheers Stéfan
numpy_mat_vector_01.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
