On Monday 12 May 2008 12:04:24 Stéfan van der Walt wrote:
> 2008/5/12 Pierre GM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > What should I do with oldnumeric.ma.power ? Try to fix it the same
> > way, or leave the bug ? I'm not that enthusiastic to have to debug the
> > old package, but if it's part of the job...
>
> We should leave the oldnumeric.ma package alone.  Even if its `power`
> is broken, some packages may depend on it.  We'll provide it in 1.2
> for backward compatibility, and get rid of it after 1.3.

OK then, I prefer that...
Additional question: when raising to a power in place, NaNs/Infs can show up 
in the _data part: should I set those invalid data to fill_value or not ?
_______________________________________________
Numpy-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to