On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The MA situation was handled slightly differently, which is > > unfortunate. I think that it is a reasonable change to make in a > > minor release, but we should have provided a warning first. At least, > > we are providing the old code still. Do you think that we should > > revisit this issue? Since we are importing the new MA from a > > different location maybe we should move the old code back to it's > > original location. Would it be reasonable to have: > > from numpy import ma --> new code > > from numpy.core import ma --> old code w/ a deprecation warning > > I think that might be better, yes.
I would like to hear from more people about whether they think this would be a useful solution to the current complaints about the new MA implementation. In particular, I would like to hear from at least the following people please: Travis, Stefan, Pierre, and David. -- Jarrod Millman Computational Infrastructure for Research Labs 10 Giannini Hall, UC Berkeley phone: 510.643.4014 http://cirl.berkeley.edu/ _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
