On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Travis E. Oliphant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Besides, having a "test-per-checkin" is not the proper mapping in my > mind. I'd rather see whole check-ins devoted to testing large pieces > of code rather than spend all unit-test foo on a rigid policy of > "regression" testing each check-in. Stéfan is proposing "test-per-bugfix", not "test-per-checkin". That is eminently feasible. You need to do some kind of testing to be sure that you actually fixed the problem. It is simply *not* *that* *hard* to write that in unit test form. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
