2008/5/25 Anne Archibald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/5/25 Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> So, please tell me how numpy is supposed to work. Write as much as you >> please. If you are so moved, why not write the tests for all 64 ufuncs for >> all types and combinations and verify that they are all correct as specified >> and raise errors when they should. > > This sounds like something that will be easier with nose (if I > understand nose correctly). Since the ufuncs are so uniform, it seems > like the zillion tests you are proposing writing should be expressed > as a list of ufuncs with some type annotations, a list of types to run > them against, and a programmatic expression of the type rules Robert > is proposing. While you can do this with the current test framework, > you get one test rather than many, and the failure report is not > nearly so valuable.
We do have ParametricTestCase, but yes -- nose makes this very easy. Regards Stéfan _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
