Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > I believe in your current setup there is no better way. But you should > seriously consider changing the way of using array data. Storing bare > pointers in the C side and not holding a reference to the object > providing the data in the C side is really error prone.
exactly. as you are passing a ndarray into your C code, another option is that you could increase the reference count to that array in your C code (Py_INCREF). Then it would not be destroyed on the Python side. However, you'd have to make sure you Py_DECREF it when you don't need it anymore. There may be a way to tell the array that is does not "own" the data block also, but I don't know the numpy API enough to tell you how to do that. -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
