Charles R Harris wrote: > > It probably just grew to fix problems as they arose. It should be > possible to test for every function and fall back to the double > versions that are more reliably present. It would be nicer if all > compilers tried to conform to recent standards, i.e., be less than 9 > years out of date, but that is a bit much to ask for.
Most compilers are not compatible (none of them supports C99 at 100 %; the better question is which subset is powerfull and implemented thouroughly). I had some surprising problems with numscons and mingw, and obviously MS compilers/runtime (each version has a different configuration for the part of the code we are talking about). cheers, David _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
