On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 06:39:21PM -1000, Eric Firing wrote: > Another typo is the culprit:
> In [2]:timeit do_Mandelbrot_cython() > 10 loops, best of 3: 53.8 ms per loop > In [3]:timeit do_Mandelbrot_cython2() > 10 loops, best of 3: 54 ms per loop > This is after I put the underscore in the x_buffer declaration in > do_Mandlebrot_cython2. As it was, with no underscore, x_buffer was > being treated as a python double. Indeed, I was looking for a forgotten type definition, but I forgotten to look for typos in the type definitions. As a results, the cython code is now of comparable speed to the weave.inline: cython=59ms and weave=62.5ms on my box. Thanks a lot, next time I'll now where to look. Gaël _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
