Thanks for the input Fernando. -dave On Jul 1, 2008, at 5:48 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 18:39, David Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> OK, thanks for the info Robert. >>> Any recommendations for another test harness? >> >> numpy and scipy are moving to nose as of numpy 1.2 and scipy 0.7. >> >> http://www.somethingaboutorange.com/mrl/projects/nose/ >> >> It has been a personal favorite of mine for some time, too. > > So has ipython recently, for what it's worth. It does make easy a lot > of things that should be easy but aren't under unittest, which is a > big plus in my view. We also adopted it after advice from Robert, > others at Enthought and Titus Brown during a BOF session at last > year's SciPy. > > The fact that nose absorbs/recognizes all regular unittest tests makes > the transition fairly easy. > > Cheers, > > f > _______________________________________________ > Numpy-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
