On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 09:01, Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Pearu Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Alan McIntyre wrote: >>> Some test files have a set_local_path()/restore_path() pair at the >>> top, and some don't. Is there any reason to be changing sys.path like >>> this in the test modules? If not, I'll take them out when I see them. >> >> The idea behind set_local_path is that it allows running tests >> inside subpackages without the need to rebuild the entire package. > > Ah, thanks; I'd forgotten about that. I'll leave them alone, then. I > made a note for myself to make sure it's possible to run tests locally > without doing a full build/install (where practical).
Please remove them and adjust the imports. As I've mentioned before, numpy and scipy can now reliably be built in-place with "python setup.py build_src --inplace build_ext --inplace". This is a more robust method to test uninstalled code than adjusting sys.path. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
