On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:53 PM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Andrew Straw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Mike Sarahan wrote: >>> I agree that the components are very small, and in a numeric sense, I >>> wouldn't worry at all about them, but the image result is simply noise, >>> albeit periodic-looking noise. >> >> Fernando Perez and John Hunter have written a nice FFT image denoising >> example: >> http://matplotlib.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/matplotlib/trunk/py4science/examples/fft_imdenoise.py?view=markup >> >> with documentation, even: >> http://matplotlib.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/matplotlib/trunk/py4science/workbook/fft_imdenoise.tex?view=markup > > Ahem. Stefan wrote that :)
By the way, I should apologize for a comment that was inadvertently rather curt. I simply meant to note that in py4science there's code from several people, and the fft piece was written by Stefan when we taught the workshop together. But Andrew had no way to know that, since that code isn't individually marked for authorship (there are acknowledgements at the start of the main document). Sorry about that, mate. Cheers, f _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
