On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 07:57:45AM -0400, Alan G Isaac wrote: > But we apparently agree that PEP 225 meets the need for > a multiplication operator (with either ~ or @). Do you > agree with Robert that *only* the multiplication operator is > needed? (See my previous post.)
No big opinion on that. Gaël _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
