Hi Stéfan Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > > I expanded the mathml module in the reference guide source to handle > constructs as they came up. I never did try to do matrices, though, > so it's quite likely that it hasn't been implemented. >
Does that mean you have to implement latex parsing by yourself ? > > I'm not sure if there is an "official" version anywhere. The URL I > got it from is in the top of the source, but I've modified the code > since. I guess fixing our version on launchpad is a good start. Ok, thanks. I thought this was done for numpy, but I guess not. > > While I like the mathml approach, it does not render perfectly on all > browsers and, as you've discovered, doesn't support all the > constructs. It may be easier to switch to the math module now in > Sphinx, rather than to update the mathml module. I'll leave the > decision up to Pauli and yourself; I don't think I am entitled to make any decision here: I have no knowledge of the stack involved here. I can only confirm than using sphinx 0.5 (the dev version) does work for latex constructs; I could not make the JS backend work, but again, I know nothing about web frameworks and co, and I guess setting up a webserver for this to work to be trivial for anyone who knows his stuff here. cheers, David _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
