On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 17:13, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Charles R Harris > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I've been cleaning up the ufunc loops and the sign function currently >> doesn't have a defined behavior for nans. This makes the results depend on >> the order/type of comparisons in the code, which looks fragile to me. So >> what should it return? I vote for nan but am open for suggestions. > > And while we're at it, lets decide how to treat max/min when nans are > involved. Or should we just say the behavior is undefined.
When feasible, I would like float(s)->float functions to return NaN when given a NaN as an argument. At least as the main versions of the function. Specific NaN-ignoring functions can also be introduced, but as separate functions. I don't know what exactly to do about float->int functions (e.g. argmin). I also don't know how these should interact with the current seterr() state. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion