Barry Wark wrote: > In our usage (neural physiology), we've recorded the physiological > response to a given stimulus. So being able to recover the _exact_ > original stimulus that produced the recorded data is critical.
I'd be inclined to say that if you really want the exact same string of psuedo-random numbers years into the future, you'd probably be safest to generate a huge string now and save it, rather than expecting a future version of a library, perhaps running on different hardware, etc, to re-generate the exact same thing in the future. -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
