Pierre GM wrote: > Nope, we still need to double check whether there's any missing data > in any field of the line we process, independently of the conversion. > So there must be some extra loop involved, and I'd need a special > function in numpy.ma to take care of that. So our options are > * create a new function in numpy.ma and leave np.loadtxt like that > * write a new np.loadtxt incorporating most of the ideas of the code I > send, but I'd still need to adapt it to support masked values.
You couldn't run this loop on the array returned by np.loadtxt() (by masking on the appropriate fill value)? >> I'll post that when I'm done and we can see if it looks like too much >> functionality stapled together or not. > > Sounds like a plan. Wouldn't mind getting more feedback from fellow > users before we get too deep, however... Agreed. Anyone? -- Ryan May Graduate Research Assistant School of Meteorology University of Oklahoma _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
