I have been using your profiler extensively and it has contributed to my achieving significant improvements in the application I work on largely due to the usefulness of the line by line breakdown enabling me to easily select the next part of code to work on optimizing. So firstly many thanks for writing it.
However back to my point, Wes, I have also experienced timing oddities, in particular on Virtual machines (MS Hyper-V has very poor processor timings, the older MS VM works fine though). I believe the negative timings arise when the CPU (be it virtual or possibly physical) deviates from its standard performance or rather the initial timer unit taken, would this make sense to you Robert? Hanni 2009/1/21 Robert Kern <[email protected]> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:13, Wes McKinney <[email protected]> wrote: > > Robert-- this is a great little piece of code, I already think it will be > a > > part of my workflow. However, I seem to be getting negative % time taken > on > > the more time consuming lines, perhaps getting some overflow? > > That's odd. Can you send me the code (perhaps offlist) or at least the > .lprof file? > > -- > Robert Kern > > "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless > enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as > though it had an underlying truth." > -- Umberto Eco > _______________________________________________ > Numpy-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
