JH, Thx for the links, but I'm afraid I need something more basic than that. For example, I'm referring to Python as:
van Rossum, G. and Drake, F. L. (eds), 2006. Python Reference Manual, Python Software Foundation,. http://docs.python.org/ref/ref.html. I could indeed use http://www.scipy.org/Citing_SciPy to cite Scipy (although the citation is incomplete), and define something similar for Numpy... Or refer to the "Computing in Science and Engineering" special issue. I'm just a bit surprised there's no official standard. Thx, P. On Jan 26, 2009, at 10:56 AM, j...@physics.ucf.edu wrote: >> What is the most up-to-date way to cite Numpy and Scipy in an >> academic >> journal ? > > Cite our conference articles here: > > http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/SciPy2008/index.html > > It would be nice if someone involved in the proceedings could post a > bibtex on the citations page. And link the citations page > to...something...easily navigated to from the front page. > > This brings up a related point: > > When someone goes to scipy.org, there is no way to navigate to > conferences.scipy.org from scipy.org except by finding the link buried > in the intro text. Ipython and all the whatever.scipy.org domains, > except for docs.scipy.org, are completely absent; you have to know > about them to find them. I don't even know where to find a complete > list of these. They should all have a presence on at least the front > page and maybe the navigation. > > --jh-- > _______________________________________________ > Numpy-discussion mailing list > Numpy-discussion@scipy.org > http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
