On Jan 24, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Ryan May wrote: >> > > Ok, thanks. I've dug a little further, and it seems like the > problem is that a > column of all missing values ends up as a column of all None's. > When you create > a (masked) array from a list of None's, you end up with an object > array. On one > hand I'd love for things to behave differently in this case, but on > the other I > understand why things work this way.
Ryan, Mind giving r6434 a try? As usual, don't hesitate to report any problem. _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
