On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:26, Ryan May <[email protected]> wrote: > Christopher Barker wrote: >>> On 1/30/2009 3:22 PM, Neal Becker wrote: >>> >>>> Now what would be _really_ cool is a special array type that would >>>> represent >>>> a constant array without wasting memory. >> >> Can't you do that with scary stride tricks? I think I remember some >> discussion of this a while back. > > I think that's right, but at that point, what gain is that over using a > regular > constant and relying on numpy's broadcasting?
The filled array may be providing some of the shape information that's not in the other arrays. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
