On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:59 PM, David Cournapeau <da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp> wrote: > Eric Firing wrote: >> >> I agree. The PEP does not show overwhelming superiority (or, arguably, >> even mild superiority) of any alternative > > I think this PEP was poorly written. You can't see any of the > advantage/differences of the different systems. Some people even said > they don't see the differences with svn. I think the reason partly is > that the PEP focused on existing python workflows, but the whole point, > at least for me, is to change the general workflow (for reviews, code > contributions, etc...). Stephen J. Turnbull sums it up nicely: > > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-March/087968.html > > FWIW, I tend to agree that Hg is less disruptive than git when coming > from svn, at least for the simple tasks (I don't know hg enough to have > a really informed opinion for more advanced workflows).
Yes, git rocks. Ondrej _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion