Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Charles R Harris > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com <mailto:charlesr.har...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Robert Kern > <robert.k...@gmail.com <mailto:robert.k...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 00:05, David Cournapeau > <da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp > <mailto:da...@ar.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp>> wrote: > > > I think we should just fix it to use conjugate - I will do > this in the > > branch, and I will integrate it in the trunk later unless > someone stands > > up vehemently against the change. I opened up a ticket to > track this, > > though, > > It breaks everyone's code that works around the current behavior. > > > Maybe we need a new function. But what to call it? > > > How about introducing acorrelate and deprecating the old version?
This does not solve the C function problem (PyArray_Correlate). The easy solution would be to keep the current C version, deal with the problem in python for acorrelate for the time being, and replace the old C function with the 'correct' one once we remove the deprecated correlate ? David _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
