On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Alan G Isaac <ais...@american.edu> wrote: > On 6/4/2009 1:27 PM josef.p...@gmail.com apparently wrote: >> Note: there are two versions of the docs for np.intersect1d, the >> currently published docs which describe the actual behavior (for the >> non-unique case), and the new docs on the doc editor >> http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/docs/numpy.lib.arraysetops.intersect1d/ >> that describe the "intended" usage of the functions, which also >> corresponds closer to the original source docstring >> (http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/docs/numpy.lib.arraysetops.intersect1d/?revision=-227 >> ). that's my interpretation > > > Again, the distributed docs do *not* describe the actual > behavior for the non-unique case. E.g., > >>>> np.intersect1d([1,1,2,3,3,4], [1,4]) > array([1, 1, 3, 4]) > > Might this is a better example of > failure than the one in the doc editor?
Thanks, that's a very clear example of a wrong answer, and it removes the question whether the function makes any sense for the non-unique case. I changed the example in the doc editor to this one. It will hopefully merged with the source at the next update. Josef > > However the doc editor version states that the function > fails for the non-unique case, so it seems there was a > documentation bug that is in the process of being fixed. Yes > > Thanks, > Alan > > _______________________________________________ > Numpy-discussion mailing list > Numpy-discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion