to, 2009-09-17 kello 18:19 +0200, Scott Sinclair kirjoitti: [clip] > It's probably important that the documentation patches should be > committed pretty soon after being reviewed for obvious malicious code > and marked "OK to Apply". It's possible to edit docstrings that are > marked as "OK to apply", without this flag being removed.
If that's possible, then it's a bug. But I don't see how that can happen -- do you have an example how to do this kind of edits that don't reset the ok_to_apply flag? > If none of the current commiters have time to commit doc patches on > demand, then perhaps it makes sense to give commit access to someone > working actively on the documentation (Ralf, DavidG ?). This could be > on the understanding that only doc patches would be commited by this > person. > > It's always going to be a lot of work when we let the trunk and > doc-editor get too far out of sync. The work scales linearly with the size of the diff to SVN, so it's not extremely bad. Of course, it's a bit of a work to go through hundreds of potential docstrings in one sitting. -- Pauli Virtanen _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
