to, 2009-10-01 kello 12:19 -0400, Ralf Gommers kirjoitti: > Sorry to ask again, but it would really be very useful to get those > docstrings merged for both scipy and numpy. [clip]
Numpy's new docstrings is are now in SVN too, for the most part. An amazing amount of work was done during the summer, thanks to all who participated! > > For numpy in principle the same procedure, except there are some > objects that need the add_newdocs treatment. There are two types of > errors, my question is (mainly to Pauli) if they both need the same > treatment or a different one. > > Errors: > 1. source location not known, like: > ERROR: numpy.broadcast.next: source location for docstring is not known > 2. source location known but failed to find a place to add docstrings, > like: > ERROR: Source location for numpy.lib.function_base.iterable known, > but failed to find a place for the docstring These I didn't commit yet. Mostly, they can be fixed by adding necessary entries to add_newdocs.py. However, some of these may be objects assigning docstrings to which may be technically difficult and requires larger changes. The second error may also indicate a bug in patch generation. -- Pauli Virtanen _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
