Added as comment in the same entry: http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1253#comment:1
Guessing that this one should be easy to fix :) On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Pierre GM <pgmdevl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Oct 7, 2009, at 2:57 AM, Gökhan Sever wrote: > > One more example. (I still think the behaviour of fill_value is > > inconsistent) > > Well, ma.masked_values use `value` to define fill_value, > ma.masked_equal does not. So yes, there's an inconsistency here. Once > again, please fill an enhancement request ticket. I should be able to > deal with this one quite soon. > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > -- Gökhan
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
