Robert Kern wrote: > > That sounds good. Another worthwhile addition would be nextafter(). > > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/nextafter.html >
Ah, I did not know about this one. I have implemented it and committed it. One issue is that it will cause failures on platforms without nextafterl and where long double != double, but I don't think we have a lot of those, if any, David _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
