On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Michael Droettboom <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't know if your 'long double' detection code is complete yet, but I > thought I'd share the current build output on one of our Solaris > machines. It looks like it may just be a typo difference between > 'IEEE_QUAD_BE' in long_double_representation() and 'IEEE_QUAD_16B_BE' in > setup.py, but I wanted to confirm.
Yes, you're right - I don't have any machine with a 128 bits long double type, so I let the typo slipped. Could you try last revision (r7726) ? David _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
