On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn <da...@student.matnat.uio.no> wrote:
> > Rolling this into the Python package distribution scheme seems backwards > though, since a lot of binary packages that have nothing to do with Python > are used as well Yep, exactly. > > To solve the exact problem you (and me) have I think the best solution is > to integrate the tools mentioned above with what David is planning (SciPI > etc.). Or if that isn't good enough, find generic "userland package > manager" that has nothing to do with Python (I'm sure a dozen > half-finished ones must have been written but didn't look), finish it, and > connect it to SciPI. You have 0install, autopackage and klik, to cite the ones I know about. I wish people had looked at those before rolling toy solutions to complex problems. > > What David does (I think) is seperate the concerns. Exactly - you've describe this better than I did David _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
