Hi, > NumPy decisions in the past have been made by me and other people who are > writing the code. I think we have tried pretty hard to listen to all > points of view before doing anything. I think there are many examples of > this. I hope this previous history alleviates some concern that something > else is going to be done here.
I think it's notable in general how collegial numpy discussions have been, and for that, thank you to you in particular. I was going to say earlier, but didn't, that your list of steerers seemed very sensible. Only a small point, but, while I completely agree that the version number is a bike-shed, I don't think that's true of the ABI breakage, but I'm sure that's not what you meant. See you, Matthew _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
