On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 8:23 PM, David Cournapeau <da...@silveregg.co.jp> wrote: > Travis Oliphant wrote: > >> >> This is true, but you could make a NumPy 1.4.x binary and the old >> SciPy binary would still presumably work. > > There is still the cython issue, although it concerns only some packages > (stats and spatial IIRC), and there is an error message at least. I > regenerated the cython files in the 0.7.x branch, so people could at > least prepare compatible binaries themselves (and as in numpy, releasing > a purely source tarball for scipy is much less of an issue - I can do it > right now since almost nothing went in the 0.7.x branch since the 0.7.1 > release).
So 1.4.1 wouldn't resolve the cython issue, packages that use cython still would need to be refreshed and recompiled, but non-cython packages should run without recompiling? Josef > > cheers, > > David > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
