On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 14:42, <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 14:26, David Goldsmith <d.l.goldsm...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:19, David Goldsmith <d.l.goldsm...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > PS: please, if you don't mind, in the future post docstring "complaints" >>>> > at >>>> > scipy-dev (numpy-discussion has many more subscribers, many of whom >>>> > probably >>>> > don't immediately care about any particular docstring problem, whereas >>>> > anyone who is working on the docstrings is - hopefully - subscribed to >>>> > scipy-dev); thanks. >>>> >>>> numpy docstrings get discussed on numpy-discussion. >>> >>> Then is it just the Wiki and related issues that we ask people to discuss @ >>> scipy-dev? >> >> I don't see a reason to do that, either. > > doceditor not moin Wiki, that was the policy that Ralf and David > followed since last summer to have all docediting questions in one > place.
Is the volume of questions really so large to justify the inconvenience to the questioners? It's one thing to direct someone to, say, the matplotlib list when asking matplotlib questions, but no one is going to guess that they need to go to scipy-dev to ask a question about the doceditor when they run into a problem editing a numpy docstring. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
