On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> wrote:
> su, 2010-02-21 kello 20:17 +0200, Pauli Virtanen kirjoitti: > [clip] > > The Capsule API seems pretty much the same as the CObject API. (Why the > > name change?) We can probably #define PyCapsule_* compatibility defines > > in npy_3kcompat.h that use PyCObject on 2.x, and use the real thing on > > 3.x. > > Btw, I read that PyCObjects are completely gone on Python 3.2, so > apparently we *have* to make this transition. > > It does look like the old interface can be emulated with the new objects, but the need for a 'name' might cause trouble. I suppose that will depend on how the current objects are used. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
