> Except for someone calling uniform(low, high, size). Ah, sorry, I didn't know about that. In that case, everything I wrote is superfluous and I apologise for a non-helping comment.
But, one could incorporate SIZE simply in the calling convention. > In any case, why > would you make this change? It doesn't seem to solve any problem or > clear up any semantics. "start" and "stop" imply a stop > start > relationship, too, albeit not as strongly. Hmm, I thought that start is where the thing starts, and stop where it stops, so it's in "virtual time" stop > start, but it can travel downwards. I thought it would help making the semantics more clear. But I see it depends on interpretation. With "low" and "high", my interpretation is on the contrary impossible. The ugly doubling was just intended for compatibility, resulting in a note "for backward compatibility reasons, you can also pass ..." or something like that. > If someone wants to pass in > a high < low, let them. It's possible, of course. Friedrich _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
