On Feb 23, 2010, at 1:03 AM, Charles R Harris wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> wrote:
ma, 2010-02-22 kello 14:01 -0700, Charles R Harris kirjoitti:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
[clip]
> > Why? PyCObjects don't serialize at all. They would never show
up in
> > a pickle to begin with.
>
> So what happens to them? I'm not that familiar with pickles
arraydescr_reduce pulls out the datetime info from the metadata dict,
and converts it to a tuple containing something pickleable. And
everything in reverse in *_setstate
Everything works except the import of the {ufunc, multiarray} api's
from the modules. If the api's are stored as PyCObjects then all the
tests pass. I'll try to get that last bit fixed up tomorrow.
Just back from PyCon. It is useful to know that the Python core team
feels that NumPy porting to 3k is a *big* deal.
Lots of people would be interested in your experiences with porting
NumPy to Python 3k. In particular, the fact that they removed APIs
and the extra pain that causes is useful information in their decision
making.
I'm not sure how big a deal it is that we have to change the API to
handle PyCapsules instead of PyCObjects, but if you have any feedback
to the python core dev team, they would be interested in hearing it
--- particularly right after PyCon.
-Travis
Chuck
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
--
Travis Oliphant
Enthought Inc.
1-512-536-1057
http://www.enthought.com
oliph...@enthought.com
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
