On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:11, Charles R Harris >> <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:56, Charles R Harris >> >> <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 10:40, Charles R Harris >> >> >> <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> > Hi All, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > David Cournapeau has mentioned that he would like to have a numpy >> >> >> > math >> >> >> > library that would supply missing functions and I'm wondering how >> we >> >> >> > should >> >> >> > organise the source code. Should we put a mathlib directory in >> >> >> > numpy/core/src? >> >> >> >> >> >> David already did this: numpy/core/src/npymath/ >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Yeah, but there isn't much low level stuff there and I don't want to >> >> > toss a >> >> > lot of real numerical code into it. >> >> >> >> Who cares? I don't. >> > >> > I care. I want the code to be organized. >> >> Then do it when there is code and we can see what needs to be organized. >> >> > I am writing code and I want to decide up front where to put it. I know > where you stand, so you need say no more. I'm waiting to see if other folks > have an opinion. > > Chuck > Will you be using it right away? If so, organize it locally how think it'll work best, work w/ it a little while and see if you "guessed" right or if you find yourself wanting to reorganize; then provide it to us w/ the benefit of your experience. :-) DG
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
