On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:16 AM, <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Vincent Davis <vinc...@vincentdavis.net> > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:55 PM, <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Gökhan Sever <gokhanse...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > There is a nice e-mailing trend tool for Gmail users > >> > at http://code.google.com/p/mail-trends/ > >> > It is a command line tool producing an html output showing your > e-mailing > >> > statistics. In my inbox, the following threads are highly ranked in > the top > >> > threads section. > >> > > >> > [Numpy-discussion] Announcing toydist, improving distribution and > packaging > >> > situation > >> > [SciPy-Dev] scipy.stats > >> > [Numpy-discussion] curious about how people would feel about moving to > >> > github > >> > > >> > Just out of curiosity, are there any mailing trends (top threads, top > >> > posters, etc...) provided for the Python related mailing archives? > >> > Share your comments please. > >> > >> I only know the top poster statistics for googlegroups > >> > >> http://groups.google.ca/group/scipy-user/about?hl=en > >> > >> but numpy-discussion and scipy-dev are not on google groups > >> > > > > Is scipy-user a google group or just mirrored? > > just mirrored, original is on scipy.org > > > > > As a side note or idea I was playing with trying to search for each > function/module in the archive as a way to rank/prioritize what > documentation may need improvement. > > For example searching > http://groups.google.ca/group/scipy-user/about?hl=en > > 38 results for randint* > > 6,950 results for optimize* > > Of course there are many reasons an it just might be popular in example > code and not really the question in the post. > > I didn't know adding stars works: > 12,600 results for *stats* > 120 results for *stats* bug >
> I would guess that the most popular functions are also the ones that > are the best documented (or they are popular because they have the > least obvious API). > > This is cool. http://groups.google.ca/advanced_search?q= So the google group is just a mirror of the mailman list? I was thinking this might be valid way to prioritize the documentation (if one wanted to do such a thing) 1; the documentation is poor, or there is no example (based on a quick look) 2; prioritize based on hits in the mail list. Vincent (for example I didn't find much on ttest, too obvious ? except for a > possible enhancement/addition > > http://groups.google.ca/group/scipy-user/browse_thread/thread/bc3c36f8908a20af/a85a5d6b7d457436?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=t_test*#a85a5d6b7d457436 > ) > > Josef > > > > > Vincent > >> > >> Josef > >> > >> > >> > -- > >> > Gökhan > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > >> > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > >> > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list > >> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > > > Vincent Davis > > 720-301-3003 > > vinc...@vincentdavis.net > > > > my blog | LinkedIn > > _______________________________________________ > > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > *Vincent Davis 720-301-3003 * vinc...@vincentdavis.net my blog <http://vincentdavis.net> | LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/vincentdavis>
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion