On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> wrote: > Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:15:55 +0000, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > [clip] > > in the history to have the wrong content -- so to be sure, we have to do > > a brute-force comparison of the tree against SVN for each commit. The > > particular bug here was fixed in the conversion tool, but better safe > > than sorry. > > Also this is now done. The repository at > > http://github.com/numpy/numpy_svn_test4 > > is essentially fine. > > You can grab it via > > git clone git://github.com/numpy/numpy_svn_test4.git > > The deleted SVN branches can also be obtained: > > git fetch origin refs/svn/*:refs/remotes/svn/* > > They are not pulled by default. > > *** > > svn-all-fast-export still has some bugs, so revisions that in SVN are > r2478, r2491, r2534, r2602, r2603, r4113, r4179, r4180 contain the wrong > tree in Git. The errors are > > - Wrong branch point for branches/arraykit (an abandoned and deleted > branch that was never merged back to trunk) > > - The commits r4113, r4179, r4180 contain changes in wrong order > (the subsequent commits are OK). > > I'd be willing just to ignore these. Such small errors should not matter. > > *** > > So as far as I see, we would be ready to go with this. > > Hi Pauli, I gave it a quick spin and it looks good so far. The cloning was really fast, I like that ;) Is there any way to test out commiting? I didn't have permissions to push to the repository.
Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
