On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:39 PM, <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Charles R Harris > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Michael Droettboom <md...@stsci.edu> wrote: >>> >>> We're having trouble using numpydoc formatted docstrings for one of our >>> own project. It seems that the "Other parameters" section is not >>> getting included in the output. >>> >>> A grep across Numpy's own source code (git master) reveals that this >>> kind of section is used in only one place -- the docstring for >>> "recarray". Curiously, the "Other Parameters" section is displayed in >>> the documentation editor here: >>> >>> http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/docs/numpy.core.records.recarray/ >>> >>> But not in the generated Numpy docs online here: >>> >>> http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.recarray.html >>> >>> Is this a bug? >>> >> >> Probably. The Other Parameters section is one of those ideas that sounded >> good at the time but didn't end up used in practice. I expect that nobody >> noticed its absence before. > > http://code.google.com/p/pydocweb/issues/detail?id=45 > > and scipy-dev mailinglist around March 18
We discussed the same problem with Other Parameters, which is also a (independent ?) problem in the doc editor. But browsing the thread and ticket, I don't see any solution. Josef > > Josef > >> Chuck. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list >> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >> >> > _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion