On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> wrote: > Hi, > > Should we set a date for a bugfix 1.5.1 release? There are some bugs that > would be nice to sort out in the 1.5.x series: > > Any Python versions: > > - #1605 (Cython vs. PEP-3118 issue: raising exceptions with active > cython buffers caused undefined behavior. Breaks Sage.) > - #1617 (Ensure complex(np.longcomplex(...)) doesn't drop the imag part) > - Fix doc build > > Python 3 specific: > > - #1604 (//-issue in distutils; infinite loop in some cases :) > - #1609 (dotblas was never used on Python 3) > - #1610 (fromfile/tofile did not stay in sync with Python 3 file handle > position -- breaks e.g. scipy.io pretty badly) > - f2py startup script didn't run properly on Py3 > > Not so many fixes so far, but I'd like to see a Numpy release with #1610 > fixed before releasing Scipy with Python 3 support. Since 2.0.0 breaks > binary compatibility and merging the refactoring back may take some time, > it would be nice to have another 1.5.x release. > > Ralf & c, opinions? I'd maybe suggest somewhere on the Oct/Nov axis. > > Sounds good. I also have some stuff I'd like to add but won't have much time before Nov. But whatever looks good to Ralf will work for me.
Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
