On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Vincent Davis <vinc...@vincentdavis.net> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Ralf Gommers > <ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> With there being two different installers for Python 2.7 on python.org >> (10.3+ has ppc/i386, 10.5+ has ppc/i386/x86_64) a change to the naming >> scheme is needed for the numpy binaries. That's assuming we provide >> two corresponding installers with the same arches. I propose the >> following: >> "numpy-%s-py%s-python.org-macosx%s.dmg" % (fullversion, pyver, osxver) >> http://github.com/rgommers/numpy/commit/2b1eb79a63cba4 >> >> These two 2.7 versions are fairly annoying by the way - only one of >> them can live in /Library/Frameworks. Here are the options I see to >> fix this: >> 1) Manually reinstall the desired version, then build the installer against >> it. >> 2) Have two clearly named virtualenvs for them and build against those >> executables without activating the virtualenvs. Then change the >> hardcoded python executable path in the generated Info.plist files >> under tools/numpy-macosx-installer/content/. >> 3) Have only the 10.5 py27 installed, create the 10.3 numpy installer >> by specifying all CFLAGS/LDFLAGS in the paver script. >> >> I'm not liking any of those options much. Anyone have a better idea? >> >> The python.org offering may change again in the near future by the >> way. Excerpt from an email by Ronald Oussoren on the pythonmac list: >> "The consensus at the [europython] summit was to replace the >> macosx10.5 installer (ppc, x86, x86_64) by a macosx10.6 (x86, x86_64) >> installer for future releases. That enables linking with Tk 8.5 and >> that would solve a number of issues other than being available in >> 64-bit code. Users of OSX 10.5 (or earlier) can still use the >> macosx10.3 installer, that would stay the same. The only difference >> for OSX 10.5 users is that they cannot use 64-bit code without >> building their own binaries." > > Just to be clear. If we are building a 10.5 numpy py27 release we > should be building it on Python > "32-bit Mac Installer disk image (2.7) for OS X 10.3 and later (sig)". > Is this correct or the proposal?
No, numpy-1.5.1-py2.7-python.org-macosx10.5.dmg would be built against the version in XX-macosx10.5 installer from python.org, and numpy-...macosx10.3.dmg against XX-macosx10.3 installer. Ralf _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
