On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Friedrich Romstedt < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ralf, > > 2010/12/5 Ralf Gommers <[email protected]>: > > It does look like a complete set. And it was named correctly and in sync > > with python.org for a single week. From pythonmac list: > > > > "With Python 2.7, there are two Mac OS X installer variants available for > > download: the "traditional" 32-bit-only (Intel and PPC) version that > > installs and runs on all versions of OS X from 10.3.9 through current > > 10.6.x; and a new 64-bit/32-bit (Intel only) variant. As discussed in > > http://bugs.python.org/issue9227, there were problems using Tkinter and > > IDLE with the original 2.7 64/32 installer. The problem is that the > > only supported non-X11 64-bit Tcl/Tk at the moment is the one supplied > > by Apple in 10.6 and the installer tried unsuccessfully to support both > > 10.5 and 10.6. For 2.7.1, the 64/32 installer now only supports 10.6.x > > and will only use the Apple-supplied Tcl/Tk 8.5. The 32-bit-only > > installer is still built to link with either an Active/State Tcl/Tk 8.4, > > if installed in /Library/Frameworks, or fallback to the Apple-supplied > > Tcl/Tk 8.4 in OS X 10.4 through 10.6." > > > > So for the next release we'll build the 10.6 binary on 10.6 again. Sigh. > > But the i386/ppc version should still be built on 10.5? > > Yes. > Shall I give you commit rights on my repo for the build logs > (concerning the i386/x86_64 10.6 build)? > Sure. > > Who is going to do the 10.6 builds? > I'll do that one. Cheers, Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
