On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:11 PM, John Salvatier > <jsalv...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > If they return a tuple of indexes I think 'mulitiindex' sounds quite > good. > > That is exactly what a multiindex is > > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-index_notation). > > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Mark Wiebe <mwwi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Ralf Gommers > >> <ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Mark Wiebe <mwwi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Charles R Harris > >>> > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Mark Wiebe <mwwi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> >>> > >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Ralf Gommers > >>> >>> <ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> Hi all, > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> On Tuesday (~2am GMT) I plan to create the 1.6.x branch and tag > the > >>> >>>> first beta. So please get your last commits for 1.6 in by Monday > >>> >>>> evening. > >>> >>>> > >>> >>>> Also, please review and add to the 1.6.0 release notes. I put in > >>> >>>> headers for several items that need a few lines in the notes, I > hope > >>> >>>> this can be filled in by the authors of those features (Charles: > >>> >>>> Legendre polynomials, Pearu: assumed shape arrays, Mark: a bunch > of > >>> >>>> stuff). > >>> >>> > >>> >>> I've added a few more things, and made a small change to the > iterator > >>> >>> construction API that I've discovered is useful, but would be more > >>> >>> difficult > >>> >>> to do later. The Python exposure of the iterator is renamed from > >>> >>> 'newiter' > >>> >>> to 'nditer', is that a reasonable name or does anyone have a better > >>> >>> suggestion? > >>> >> > >>> >> I think nditer is fine, certainly better than newiter. I don't see > >>> >> where > >>> >> nditer appears in the changes though, the test still uses newiter. > >>> > > >>> > I didn't rename the files, I can do that too. > >>> > >>> Hi Mark, I see you just did this, but is there anything else you > >>> want/need to do? If it's necessary I can postpone the first beta by a > >>> couple of days. Better that than rush things too much and end up with > >>> an API you have reservations about. > >> > >> I've committed one other change I wanted, renaming > >> NPY_ITER_NO_INNER_ITERATION to something hopefully a bit more intuitive. > >> Nothing else was nagging at me, but it would be great if some people > went > >> through the iterator documentation to see if all the names fit their > >> intuition. We should also come to a consensus on what to call index > tuples, > >> and rename ravel_coords, NPY_ITER_COORDS, NpyIter_GotoCoords, and > >> NpyIter_GetGetCoords based on the chosen name. > > MultiIndex / multi_index works for me too. Can you rename that today > if no one comes up with something better? I've pushed a patch with the rename. Can someone review it to check that it's all good? -Mark >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
