On 4/20/2011 1:55 PM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Christoph Gohlke<cgoh...@uci.edu> wrote: >> >> >> On 4/17/2011 8:55 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The list of open issues for 1.6.0 is down to a handful: >>> >>> - f2py segfault on Ubuntu reported by David (David, did you get any >>> further with this?) >>> - #1801: test_noncentral_f failure on win64 >>> - #1798: type promotion regression (needs review, >>> https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/73) >>> - API docs for new parameters to ufuncs (full list: 'casting', 'out', >>> 'order', 'subok', 'dtype'), >>> - API docs, some docstrings and update of NEP for datetime >>> >>> I'm planning to release the first release candidate next weekend if >>> these are solved. As far as I know no one is working on the doc >>> issues right now. It would be great if someone could step up and do >>> this. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ralf >> >> >> Hi Ralf, >> >> I submitted a patch for issue #1801. All tests now pass on win-amd64-py3.2 >> with numpy 1.6.x from git. > > Great, thanks. > >> Would it be possible to get the attached patch for scipy ticket #678 >> <http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/ticket/678> into numpy 1.6? The >> fix/workaround for the scipy ODR failures is to change the ifort >> optimization flag from /O3 to /O1. > > Several other people already ran into this, so it would probably still > good to change this for 1.6.0. This change is part of a proposed > patch: http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1378. Do any of the > other changes there look relevant too? > > Ralf
The changes for the Intel Visual Fortran Compiler looks OK. '/Qip' is the default option, and '/Qipo','/Qipo_obj' have already been removed some time ago. I have not used older Intel Fortran compilers but the '-xHOST' switch does not seem apt. Christoph _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
