On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:35 AM, Pauli Virtanen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 15 May 2011 10:32:17 +0200, Ralf Gommers wrote: > >> OK, the format for that part of the signature is in line 4910 in > >> ufunc_object.c. The question is, which should we fix, the format or the > >> autosummary? > > > > The format please. That [, out] never made sense to me. > > The problem here is that there is no standard format for this: > > ceil(a, out=None) > > does not work, since `out` is not a keyword parameter. > > Anyway, I have a fix for the autosummary parser, so I think both fixing > it, and making the above arguments real keyword arguments makes sense. > > I think the formatting could be moved up into the Ufunc class in generate_umath.py or even into the ufunc docs themselves. That would make it more accessible than leaving it in the c code.
Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list [email protected] http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
