On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Keith Goodman <kwgood...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:33 AM,  <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have a function in two versions, one vectorized, one with loop
>>
>> the vectorized function  gets all randn variables in one big array
>> rvs = distr.rvs(args, **{'size':(nobs, nrep)})
>>
>> the looping version has:
>>    for irep in xrange(nrep):
>>        rvs = distr.rvs(args, **{'size':nobs})
>>
>> the rest should be identical (except for vectorization
>>
>> Is there a guarantee that the 2d arrays are filled up in a specific
>> order so that the loop and vectorized version produce the same result,
>> given the same seed?
>
> Are you pulling the numbers from rows or columns of the 2d array?
> Columns seem to work:

Sorry, I meant rows.

>>> rs = np.random.RandomState([1,2,3])
>>> rs.randn(3,3)
> array([[ 0.89858245,  0.25528877,  0.95172625],
>       [-0.05663392,  0.54721555,  0.11512385],
>       [ 0.82495129,  0.17252144,  0.74570118]])
>
> which gives the same as
>
>>> rs = np.random.RandomState([1,2,3])
>>> rs.randn(3)
>   array([ 0.89858245,  0.25528877,  0.95172625])
>>> rs.randn(3)
>   array([-0.05663392,  0.54721555,  0.11512385])
>>> rs.randn(3)
>   array([ 0.82495129,  0.17252144,  0.74570118])
>
> I get similar results with np.random.seed
>
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to